. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3

 Mager123789 Banned
Posted: March 27, 2009 05:38 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Tttkaab|Brandon
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 622
Member No.: 123
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 53
Flippie a spy? Rofl that's bullshit, he came to MY events when I was a raid leader. That's how long he's been here, that's how long he's been dedicated for. I don't see him being a spy but I don't care if Mugger gets unbanned or not to be honest, a ban always has been a joke, it's stupid anyways seeing as people change at different points in their lives. I'm happy to have Mugger back but it disgusts me that people would even consider one of the most loyal and most active members of our time a spy. Give him some credibility god damn.

I'm sure there must be an over-exaggeration, or there misconception of what "spying" really is. Either that or you're just being too sensitive Elias. Give Flippie a break.


Copy pasted from General Matters which is why Mugger is mentioned.
I don't see how him wanting zlatan to have some privileges makes him a spy... Or how wit's even relevant.
Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Posted: March 27, 2009 06:57 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Vephy
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 6186
Member No.: 813
Joined: June 10, 2008
Total Events Attended: 478
He has been here a long time :\ Are you sure that evidence is that conclusive? Weird.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 07:23 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (T Dwag @ March 27, 2009 05:38 am)
Flippie a spy? Rofl that's bullshit, he came to MY events when I was a raid leader. That's how long he's been here, that's how long he's been dedicated for. I don't see him being a spy but I don't care if Mugger gets unbanned or not to be honest, a ban always has been a joke, it's stupid anyways seeing as people change at different points in their lives. I'm happy to have Mugger back but it disgusts me that people would even consider one of the most loyal and most active members of our time a spy. Give him some credibility god damn.

I'm sure there must be an over-exaggeration, or there misconception of what "spying" really is. Either that or you're just being too sensitive Elias. Give Flippie a break.


Copy pasted from General Matters which is why Mugger is mentioned.
I don't see how him wanting zlatan to have some privileges makes him a spy... Or how wit's even relevant.
Brandon

You have no concept of the proof we have mounted to suggest he is a spy.
I don't care how tight he was with you.
He is a spy without question.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 08:14 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Vephy
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 6186
Member No.: 813
Joined: June 10, 2008
Total Events Attended: 478
What info did he leak anyway? Were all clan mates here so that isn't subject to non-disclosure is it?
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 09:53 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
From what I know he leaked our war information for certain, and he probably leaked more.

I just want to add guys, I wouldn't ban him just for fun. Haven't you taken a step back and realised I actually have a good reason for this?
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 10:44 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
I am going to have to say that, having seen the information, and having built the system that produced it, the evidence is 100% conclusive that the leaking was done from Mager's account.

I do agree with Elias on the fact of it not needing to be public knowledge, in fact, I am of the opinion that even Council doesn't need to know all of the methods of spy-catching - I recall several council leaving and causing trouble with such knowledge.
The fact is, the fewer people knowing, the better chance of the knowledge being confined to those people.

I however will say that, if I was a regular member, I wouldn't be too happy about it, assuming that the leaders made up the evidence.


In this case however, no evidence was made by anyone, and it is all very solid. You guys are just going to have to trust us.


-RobbieThe1st
 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Posted: March 27, 2009 11:50 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Vephy
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 6186
Member No.: 813
Joined: June 10, 2008
Total Events Attended: 478
Ok, just you will problem always have people questioning that rule. He was here a long time and everything. So its upsetting.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 03:38 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ubg Fcbruges
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1209
Member No.: 1373
Joined: October 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 64
wow :s
 
--------------------
user posted imagePortfoliouser posted image


user posted image
~~ WG Emeritus - 20 November 2010 ~~
~~ WG Higher Guardian - 10 November 2009 ~~
~~ WG Emeritus - 2 July 2009 ~~
~~ WG Higher Guardian - 27 February 2009 ~~
~~ WG Guardian - 12 December 2008 ~~
~~ WG Trial Guardian - 30 October 2008 ~~

Posted: March 27, 2009 04:50 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ansatsublade
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 765
Member No.: 101
Joined: January 3, 2008
Total Events Attended: 120
This... shocks me... Shocks me a lot.

I need some time right now.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 05:27 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Karlfischer
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 664
Member No.: 124
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 55
QUOTE (RobbieThe2nd @ March 27, 2009 10:44 am)
I am going to have to say that, having seen the information, and having built the system that produced it, the evidence is 100% conclusive that the leaking was done from Mager's account.

I do agree with Elias on the fact of it not needing to be public knowledge, in fact, I am of the opinion that even Council doesn't need to know all of the methods of spy-catching - I recall several council leaving and causing trouble with such knowledge.
The fact is, the fewer people knowing, the better chance of the knowledge being confined to those people.

I however will say that, if I was a regular member, I wouldn't be too happy about it, assuming that the leaders made up the evidence.


In this case however, no evidence was made by anyone, and it is all very solid. You guys are just going to have to trust us.


-RobbieThe1st

I do not think any evidence is 100%, it only becomes so close to 100% that is ridiculous to think otherwise.

Short of having an IP match, I do not see how you could have near-100% evidence that it was from Mager's account. Even if there is an IP match, Lordy has said that the information was supplied by Mugger. In that case if Mugger somehow knew Mager's IP address (say he wrote down a few of them before he left) then he could fabricate information implicating that Mager leaked info in order to get ex-member back.

I am not saying that is the case, or even likely, but just trying to show how that even the most seemingly solid evidence can have limitations.

I understand that you need to keep your methods secret, and I am willing to trust that the evidence you have is solid, however what I do not trust is that you are going to hold that evidence up to the same amount of scrutiny that members would if it was made public. I am not saying you should make the evidence public, but if a number of members are casting doubt upon Mager being a spy, I think the proper response is to say you will look further into the evidence and not simply dismiss their worries with claims your evidence is 100%.

I suppose I could just opt to see the evidence myself like Lordy has offered, however I would rather not in case it becomes a liability for me in the future (for example if the method was leaked and there was a witch hunt to find out who did it).
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 27, 2009 06:31 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 7306
Member No.: 47
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 343
QUOTE (His Lordship @ March 27, 2009 09:53 am)
From what I know he leaked our war information for certain, and he probably leaked more.

I just want to add guys, I wouldn't ban him just for fun. Haven't you taken a step back and realised I actually have a good reason for this?

What's your good reason? I think this whole month has been full of shit reasons.
 
--------------------
July 5, 2007 - June 27, 2011

Posted: March 27, 2009 07:03 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Chimpy
Group: Banned
Posts: 2521
Member No.: 1474
Joined: November 16, 2008
Total Events Attended: 133
I trust in the council.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 12:44 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Tttkaab|Brandon
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 622
Member No.: 123
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 53
QUOTE (His Lordship @ March 27, 2009 07:23 am)
QUOTE (T Dwag @ March 27, 2009 05:38 am)
Flippie a spy? Rofl that's bullshit, he came to MY events when I was a raid leader. That's how long he's been here, that's how long he's been dedicated for. I don't see him being a spy but I don't care if Mugger gets unbanned or not to be honest, a ban always has been a joke, it's stupid anyways seeing as people change at different points in their lives. I'm happy to have Mugger back but it disgusts me that people would even consider one of the most loyal and most active members of our time a spy. Give him some credibility god damn.

I'm sure there must be an over-exaggeration, or there misconception of what "spying" really is. Either that or you're just being too sensitive Elias. Give Flippie a break.


Copy pasted from General Matters which is why Mugger is mentioned.
I don't see how him wanting zlatan to have some privileges makes him a spy... Or how wit's even relevant.
Brandon

You have no concept of the proof we have mounted to suggest he is a spy.
I don't care how tight he was with you.
He is a spy without question.

It's not because he was "tight" with me, it's cause he was a good member and doesn't really have any motives to be a spy after being here so long. What if the government (using the American one in this case) arrested a loved, trust worthy governor for no reason without any explanations? Questions need to be answered at times like this when such a character gets banned without proof to the public. It's not fair for us, how do we know this isn't just like the Salem which trials? Technically you could say "you're it" ban someone and keep it quiet. That's not right.




Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Posted: March 28, 2009 01:57 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
And other times the public has to trust that the people running their government actually know more about what they're doing than Joe the plumber sitting on his couch recliner, and trust that when they say they can't tell us without causing considerable harm to the country and our ability to defend ourselves against future attacks then they MIGHT actually be telling the truth. wink.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 04:52 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
How could you POSSIBLY have such little faith in my integrity after all I have done?
I NEVER manipulate things to find an outcome that favours myself.
I have only ever been as unbiased as possible.

And here you are bitching about my credibility.
I am TELLING you he was a spy, and if you can't trust your leader, you can't trust anyone in this fucking clan.

You need to have some faith in me.
There is no room for mistakes in this evidence.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 05:00 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ March 27, 2009 05:27 pm)
QUOTE (RobbieThe2nd @ March 27, 2009 10:44 am)
I am going to have to say that, having seen the information, and having built the system that produced it, the evidence is 100% conclusive that the leaking was done from Mager's account.

I do agree with Elias on the fact of it not needing to be public knowledge, in fact, I am of the opinion that even Council doesn't need to know all of the methods of spy-catching - I recall several council leaving and causing trouble with such knowledge.
The fact is, the fewer people knowing, the better chance of the knowledge being confined to those people.

I however will say that, if I was a regular member, I wouldn't be too happy about it, assuming that the leaders made up the evidence.


In this case however, no evidence was made by anyone, and it is all very solid. You guys are just going to have to trust us.


-RobbieThe1st

I do not think any evidence is 100%, it only becomes so close to 100% that is ridiculous to think otherwise.

Short of having an IP match, I do not see how you could have near-100% evidence that it was from Mager's account. Even if there is an IP match, Lordy has said that the information was supplied by Mugger. In that case if Mugger somehow knew Mager's IP address (say he wrote down a few of them before he left) then he could fabricate information implicating that Mager leaked info in order to get ex-member back.

I am not saying that is the case, or even likely, but just trying to show how that even the most seemingly solid evidence can have limitations.

I understand that you need to keep your methods secret, and I am willing to trust that the evidence you have is solid, however what I do not trust is that you are going to hold that evidence up to the same amount of scrutiny that members would if it was made public. I am not saying you should make the evidence public, but if a number of members are casting doubt upon Mager being a spy, I think the proper response is to say you will look further into the evidence and not simply dismiss their worries with claims your evidence is 100%.

I suppose I could just opt to see the evidence myself like Lordy has offered, however I would rather not in case it becomes a liability for me in the future (for example if the method was leaked and there was a witch hunt to find out who did it).

Lordy may not like this, but I am going to say that it is not an IP match(IPs are not nearly as good as you may think), but a unique account identifier match - we -know- that mager's account was the one the leaking was done from.

Also, this information is something that I have error-correction algoritms for, and its decyphering methods are complex, such that faking it would be hard even -IF- you knew how I created the info.

I will show you exactly how and where if you need, as I too trust you.


 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Posted: March 28, 2009 05:07 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
this sounds like the Jordon thing from way back. WE ARENT GOING TO BE TOLD WHY HE WAS BANNED AND WHAT EVIDENCE THERE WAS. JUST FUCKING TRUST THE LEADERSHIP. Thats why they are the, dare I say it, LEADERS.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 07:09 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Tttkaab|Brandon
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 622
Member No.: 123
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 53
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ March 28, 2009 05:07 am)
this sounds like the Jordon thing from way back. WE ARENT GOING TO BE TOLD WHY HE WAS BANNED AND WHAT EVIDENCE THERE WAS. JUST FUCKING TRUST THE LEADERSHIP. Thats why they are the, dare I say it, LEADERS.

Yeah I was against that too. Why is Lordy taking it so personally? I just believe that information should be disclosed to the public, it won't discredit you in any manner but whatever. The only reason you should be this sensitive is if you doubt your own decision. Fuck what I think right?



Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Posted: March 28, 2009 07:56 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Vephy
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 6186
Member No.: 813
Joined: June 10, 2008
Total Events Attended: 478
Ya I trust your decision. It is healthy for the members to question these things though.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 08:17 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (T Dwag @ March 28, 2009 07:09 am)
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ March 28, 2009 05:07 am)
this sounds like the Jordon thing from way back. WE ARENT GOING TO BE TOLD WHY HE WAS BANNED AND WHAT EVIDENCE THERE WAS. JUST FUCKING TRUST THE LEADERSHIP. Thats why they are the, dare I say it, LEADERS.

Yeah I was against that too. Why is Lordy taking it so personally? I just believe that information should be disclosed to the public, it won't discredit you in any manner but whatever. The only reason you should be this sensitive is if you doubt your own decision. Fuck what I think right?



Brandon

As soon as I do that, all the other spies will avoid it, and Robbie's system will collapse.

_______

Robie, disclose information as you wish.
It is your system and it has always belonged to you.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 11:43 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Bam
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2762
Member No.: 131
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 111
i think some people are too fkn dumb to understand that letting us see the evidence would mean the collapse of our spy-catching system. And you really think it is worth it?
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 07:29 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Tttkaab|Brandon
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 622
Member No.: 123
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 53
QUOTE (Bambaleo @ March 28, 2009 11:43 am)
i think some people are too fkn dumb to understand that letting us see the evidence would mean the collapse of our spy-catching system. And you really think it is worth it?

I don't give a fuck HOW he caught the spy to be honest, I have no idea how his spy catching techniques are directly relevant to the dialogue released by Flippie. Maybe you could explain it to my dumb ass please?




Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Posted: March 28, 2009 08:45 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
If Robbie came up with it, then it's probably so far advanced it's nearly sentient. hash.png
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: March 28, 2009 10:44 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Karlfischer
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 664
Member No.: 124
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 55
Lordy just let me look at the evidence, and I can now completely understand everything he has been saying.

There is absolutely no way that the evidence can be shared with the WG members. You are going to have to trust the leadership on this one.

I will say this, no spy catching method, not even this one, is 100%, but they have come so damn close it is scary. I am sorry to say, but Mager did leak something, and does deserve the ban given to him.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: March 29, 2009 01:01 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 7306
Member No.: 47
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 343
Even from you Karl I won't accept that. The leadership has made quite a few decisions without any voice from the people and this is one I can't stand idly by.
 
--------------------
July 5, 2007 - June 27, 2011

Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3