. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (2) 1 [2]

 no thanks
Posted: November 20, 2008 04:32 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ November 20, 2008 04:04 am)
QUOTE (rachellove9 @ November 20, 2008 02:36 am)
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ November 19, 2008 12:29 pm)
If you're emeritus go be busy with the reason that your emeritus then looking at the adult forum. There was a reason Google was invented and it wasn't to help you write papers. wink.gif

Joe I laughed in real life. I don't think any one is desparate for porn. It is just the principal of the reason to keep them from being eligible to join that forum. I myself am not willing to show my private information to join there.

I think the counter was added to keep track of who doesn't attend wars by all members. So it looks badly and they can harass you if your number is low. Yet another way of forcing war to be important in WG. Just my thoughts on it.

My number is not as bad as some of the others.

They're emeritus, they can't have every right and privilege an active member has. It's the principle of it, not fair for an active member to be active and involved and an emeritus can have the same privileges without the responsibility. rolleyes.gif

pft I am more involved than half of wg, and I can't even get on rs.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: November 20, 2008 05:34 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Bam
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2762
Member No.: 131
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 111
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ November 20, 2008 04:04 am)
QUOTE (rachellove9 @ November 20, 2008 02:36 am)
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ November 19, 2008 12:29 pm)
If you're emeritus go be busy with the reason that your emeritus then looking at the adult forum. There was a reason Google was invented and it wasn't to help you write papers. wink.gif

Joe I laughed in real life. I don't think any one is desparate for porn. It is just the principal of the reason to keep them from being eligible to join that forum. I myself am not willing to show my private information to join there.

I think the counter was added to keep track of who doesn't attend wars by all members. So it looks badly and they can harass you if your number is low. Yet another way of forcing war to be important in WG. Just my thoughts on it.

My number is not as bad as some of the others.

They're emeritus, they can't have every right and privilege an active member has. It's the principle of it, not fair for an active member to be active and involved and an emeritus can have the same privileges without the responsibility. rolleyes.gif

who the hell is talking about porn? did i say something about it? no then why are you coming up with it? i never said i wanted to view the forums because of the porn.


and wtf are you talking about responsibility? it's an adult forum = fun forum....i wouldn't mind if emeritus wasn't able to viw the war forums but this...it's ridiculous, just like the stuff you're saying.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: November 20, 2008 08:52 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
QUOTE (rachellove9 @ November 20, 2008 02:36 pm)
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ November 19, 2008 12:29 pm)
If you're emeritus go be busy with the reason that your emeritus then looking at the adult forum. There was a reason Google was invented and it wasn't to help you write papers. wink.gif

Joe I laughed in real life. I don't think any one is desparate for porn. It is just the principal of the reason to keep them from being eligible to join that forum. I myself am not willing to show my private information to join there.

Rach has succinctly said exactly what a fair few emeritus are thinking....

Once again... I point out that half of emeritus (yes I agree some of emeritus do get an easy ride) have spent a significant portion of their time in WG in a position of responsobility, I myself have been in WG since June? 2007 I think....

Of that time up untill my resignation about a month ago I had only spent 6 WEEKS as anything other than a leadership position (a week or 2 as trial and 4-5 weeks as a normal member) so I really don't get why I should be penalised because I can't juggle 50+ Hours a week of work as well as an event or two.

I have to agree with Bam to say that you truly don't understand the issue here Joe, it is not that I can't see the potential porn in the Adult forum, because personally I wouldn't watch it anyway, but it is more that people like myself who have dedicated themselves to WG for a significant period of time are now being told "no thanks, you only matter if you can come to wars/events".

To me this defeats the entire point of WG as a community clan, as effectively you are saying the only thing we care about is what events you can attend now, not what you have done for WG in the past, nor what you may do in the future.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: November 20, 2008 04:11 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Rick Hamm
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 573
Member No.: 1214
Joined: July 14, 2008
Total Events Attended: 6
I agree. Basically what you're saying is that Emeritus don't really matter to WG...UNLESS, they can make to wars and such. It's not very fair to those who are Emeritus to be treated in this way. Afterall, almost every member of the Emeritus rank has had a positive influence and helped mold this clan. To shun them now just because they don't play RS as much as the rest of you is truly a shame.

Emeritus needs to be fixed and those with that rank, treated with a little more respect than what's being shown them now...especially from certain members who AREN'T leaders.
 
--------------------

Posted: November 20, 2008 04:14 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (Bambaleo @ November 18, 2008 08:10 pm)
take that war attendance badge off, i don't want it, and i know i can refuse having one. I don't want it because it doesn't say the thruth. I have attended more wars than the most of you, and the fact that it says i have attended 2 wars is a nice slap into my face, it's disrespectfull.


same as the fact that emeritus people can't view the adult forums because we are not dedicated enough, even if most of emeritus used to be tertiaries or even council for more than a year. That's another slap into our faces.

I'm on the same war count as you.
And I have attended more wars than you.
I'm not complaining.
It's a measure of recent activity not overall activity.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: November 21, 2008 05:26 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Karlfischer
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 664
Member No.: 124
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 55
There are bigger issues here than a war banner. Emeritus are being used as a scapegoat for us losing the SA war. We were outnumbered at the SA war, but we still could have won by being better organized. Unfortunatly we had doomed ourselves to losing by persuing a policy of 1 war every 3 weeks, so that as a clan we were all a rusty at warring.

Emeritus are not supposed to be an active rank anyways, so when they come to wars at all we should be thankful for their activity. It does not make any sense to blame activity problems on members whos rank is defined by inactivity.

It makes even less sense to impose forum restrictions upon them. I can understand restricting them from voting, because the council position pertains to active members, however that is with the assumption that the inactive status of emritus is not open to debate. For such matters emeritus should have a say as it directly affects them. I however can see no justification for restricting them from adult forums other than pure spite.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: November 22, 2008 06:54 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Gorgemaster
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9840
Member No.: 3
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 540
QUOTE
so when they come to wars at all we should be thankful for their activity.


No they're not supposed to be active as in attending an event or more a week, BUT they are supposed to attend full out wars.

 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted imageuser posted image

Pages: (2) 1 [2]