The Wilderness Guardians (IPB1 Forums Archive)
Welcome Guest
. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE. 		"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (4) 1 2 3 [4]

 Stay in WG
 
Elyxiatic
Posted: August 17, 2008 10:26 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Maths
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1855
Member No.: 54
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 286
QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ August 17, 2008 11:45 am)
It's people like Bobster, Mathsnerd, and Chris that this clan could do without...and 2 of the 3 are people of rank. The clan don't need all the negativity that is being shown, especially at this stage of the game.

Yes hello rick hamm, ex-guardian of wg.

With the release of these new pvp worlds coming up, I hope wg can change for the better and start doing some new style of pvp.
Hopefully then it will set us apart from the old school.
Then you won't have to waste your time posting annoying junk.

You might even start showing some respect to those who lead this clan.
What a shame that you think nobody could be as great as you and gene, and all those old school people.

You sir, are truly up yourself.
I hope to never turn out like you.


 
--------------------
user posted image

"Journeys are what brings us happiness,
Not the destination."

~ Two time ex-raid leader of wg ~

user posted image
Eregion2
Posted: August 17, 2008 01:59 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ August 17, 2008 03:54 am)
QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ August 17, 2008 01:45 am)
Nice attitudes.  You all should be on your knees thanking Gene for even THINKING about helping out around here after what you did to him.  We got some very ungrateful people in this clan.

It's people like Bobster, Mathsnerd, and Chris that this clan could do without...and 2 of the 3 are people of rank.  The clan don't need all the negativity that is being shown, especially at this stage of the game. 

Boy oh boy, I sure hope Gene knows what he's doing and can right the wrongs here.  I have all the faith in the world that he'll do what's right and what he says he's going to do. 

WG will be a better place...for everyone, not just the higher ranked members.

good ur not in wg or id be banned as well........

/me hopes lordy doesn't ban me when he comes back

“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” Dr. Seuss was cool. tighthug.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image
His Lordship
Posted: August 17, 2008 02:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
 Rick that is total bullshit.
 
--------------------
user posted image
His Lordship
Posted: August 17, 2008 02:30 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (Valdremia @ August 17, 2008 04:49 am)
Nice. Then stop making preemptive good posts with negative con-nations in implications of how one would run a clan when already handing the reins but sowing the seeds of catastrophe if not run by one by implication of implying - making it public when could have one chosen to be private by goodwill if only the intention is of wisdom and clear conscious.

An indication to me of implication so obvious that it is reflective.

If for not self-relish solely while one thinks that one owns all the rights to make the life and death of an organization such as a clan, of people with feelings - to the least - treat those who had performed from the least to the most - even if without thou - a respect they have with their truest form possible here - they have done. And not chuck people, no matter how credible or incredible one thinks they are in own books (emphasized in "own" books deemed as failed or threat).

When handed in rein, respect that decision. While one may feel entirely owning, one does not own others of who they have given for their role truthfully. To take away that, just because of whims, when the time comes (whether or not the excuse is its needed) - means, the king is playing the pawns, knights, bishops and queen - that is all there is to it, when the likings of reason, crafts to its liking and molded to prove its point. Real but also unreal.

Gratz at both ends with no harm intended but only honesty.

And for the note of not leaving as such, I'm sure with strong realization, I'm sure not leaving would desire more than just a note or the happenings of what's now.



EDIT: Another thing. I don't care who believes in this or not. Only old school to relive community? Outlive or outlaw? Be who you can be - old or new - who cares - just be. Cheers!

You are completely off the mark. I am not trying to sow chaos. I am aiming to achieve the opposite. I remain true to the principles on which this community was founded.
 
--------------------
user posted image
Valdremia
Posted: August 17, 2008 02:53 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Valdremia
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 289
Member No.: 64
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 9
QUOTE (His Lordship @ August 17, 2008 10:30 pm)
QUOTE (Valdremia @ August 17, 2008 04:49 am)
Nice. Then stop making preemptive good posts with negative con-nations in implications of how one would run a clan when already handing the reins but sowing the seeds of catastrophe if not run by one by implication of implying - making it public when could have one chosen to be private by goodwill if only the intention is of wisdom and clear conscious.

An indication to me of implication so obvious that it is reflective.

If for not self-relish solely while one thinks that one owns all the rights to make the life and death of an organization such as a clan, of people with feelings - to the least - treat those who had performed from the least to the most - even if without thou - a respect they have with their truest form possible here - they have done. And not chuck people, no matter how credible or incredible one thinks they are in own books (emphasized in "own" books deemed as failed or threat).

When handed in rein, respect that decision. While one may feel entirely owning, one does not own others of who they have given for their role truthfully. To take away that, just because of whims, when the time comes (whether or not the excuse is its needed) -  means, the king is playing the pawns, knights, bishops and queen - that is all there is to it, when the likings of reason, crafts to its liking and molded to prove its point. Real but also unreal.

Gratz at both ends with no harm intended but only honesty.

And for the note of not leaving as such, I'm sure with strong realization, I'm sure not leaving would desire more than just a note or the happenings of what's now.



EDIT: Another thing. I don't care who believes in this or not. Only old school to relive community? Outlive or outlaw? Be who you can be -  old or new - who cares - just be. Cheers!

You are completely off the mark. I am not trying to sow chaos. I am aiming to achieve the opposite. I remain true to the principles on which this community was founded.

If so, then I am glad to be off the mark completely and respect that decision.
 
--------------------
"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." - Barack Obama

user posted image
chrisyabsley
Posted: August 17, 2008 04:15 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: chrisyabsley
Group: Guest
Posts: 53
Member No.: 161
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 7
 QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ August 17, 2008 02:19 am)
You're probably right Karl, I'd persecute them just like all you are persecuting us.


Whos this "US" you are talking about Mr Hamm, i mean are you talking about the whole of the Oldskool or just you and Eugene?
 
--------------------
user posted image
Bassism
Posted: August 17, 2008 06:46 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Owennnn
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1447
Member No.: 37
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 55
QUOTE (chrisyabsley @ August 17, 2008 04:15 pm)
QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ August 17, 2008 02:19 am)
You're probably right Karl, I'd persecute them just like all you are persecuting us.


Whos this "US" you are talking about Mr Hamm, i mean are you talking about the whole of the Oldskool or just you and Eugene?

z0mg Old Skool > New School.

IDC, I'll happily come back if Eugene returns. And I'll do anything to help, including increased activity.
 
--------------------
Spicy63
Posted: August 17, 2008 06:56 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Spicy63
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 785
Member No.: 50
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 0
 I don't really understand all this 'Old School' to 'New School' confrontation. Some Old are saying that WG was better before, and that's right, it probably was. But we have to work with what we have now, why not look back at how it was so great before. And improve upon those instances to make it like that once again.

I think this metaphor might help,

When you're around the age of 20, you go out, you have fun, you party. Eventually you will grow old, and more than likely your life won't be as full of exictement. But you're still the same person you were when you were 20.

So, you can look back at those times and admire them. But you're still the same person. Don't be a dick to yourself.

Sorry for the blunt words.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
Split 69
Posted: August 17, 2008 09:16 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Split 69
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 254
Member No.: 338
Joined: March 18, 2008
Total Events Attended: 0
 good luck eugene
 
--------------------
"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens."
- Hendrix

Proud Ex-Member of WG
Nirvanas Guy
Posted: August 18, 2008 12:11 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Nirvanas
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 334
Member No.: 240
Joined: February 16, 2008
Total Events Attended: 24
 You say you need the former members...

It's not music to the ears of the new members.

I love how those that have been in WG for a long time, or perhaps were in it during its early days can reminisce about perhaps "better" WG times.

But there's a few aspects of this whole "old school WG" thing that I think are hardly beneficial.

It is apparent that WG was once much more prominent and powerful in the clan world than it is now.

But I don't think that means present day WG have less enjoyment than they did back then, and I'm sure every member wants to restore the clan to it's former glory. I personally don't see that happening if we are forever looking back and saying, "ye I wish it was still like that". We're never going to grow if whenever we make a step forward we state how we're still 2nd best when it comes to the old days.

By all means come and work your magic mate, even just your being here gives everyone hope.

But try and take this old wg thing off of it's pedestal bringing to light the pro's of the modern day WG which I absolutely adore.

Ye this clan needs work, but I'm fed up of hearing how it's so wounded with a mediocre community.

I know I love it here and I first joined this clan 6 months ago.

Welcome back dude, I hope you do improve the clan but I'd just like to say, I love it even now.

x
 
--------------------
Safe as fuck mate, safe as fuck

Pages: (4) 1 2 3 [4]