. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official
 Physics: Kinematics
Posted: October 20, 2009 10:31 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: dieyou2000
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 711
Member No.: 1300
Joined: August 28, 2008
Total Events Attended: 158
I'm pretty sure it's called kinematics anyway. Well yeah so basically I'm in physics, which is "taught like a college class". Apparently this means "never lecture or instruct the class" to my teacher and I've been able to learn most of the stuff on my own but there is this one thing I can't get, and he's no help so I've come here.

A sample problem would be something like:

A cannon shoots a cannonball at a speed of 50.0 m/s at an angle of 25 degrees from the ground.

A) Find the vertical and horizontal components.

I can find the components that isn't hard at all.

cool.gif How long does the cannonball stay in the air?

Now I know I only use the vertical factors. So I would use -9.81 m/s(squared) for acceleration, time is the variable I'm trying to find, and I'm pretty sure initial velocity is just the 50.0 m/s. I have no idea about final velocity or whether I need distance.

C) How far does the cannonball go horizontally?

Again I know to separate it into only horizontal factors, but past that I have no clue what to do.

D) What is the maximum height the cannonball reaches?

*starts slamming head against desk*

The forumulas we're using are:

vf=vi+at
x=vi(t)+1/2a(t(squared))
vf(squared)=vi(squared)+2ax
x=1/2(vi+vf)t

vf=final velocity
vi=initial velocity
x=displacement/distance
t=time
a=acceleration

I'm pretty sure you're supposed to use the initial velocity combined with the angle too? So like it would be 50.0(cos 25) or something like that?

Other major thing I don't get is how to use initial and final velocities work. I get that if it's the maximum height you use 0 for final velocity, but other than that I'm clueless.

Any help appreciated.

P.S. - Fuck my teacher.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

Posted: October 20, 2009 10:33 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Samurai-JM
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3204
Member No.: 117
Joined: January 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
physics is easy
 
--------------------
-=}¤- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -¤{=-
user posted image

W I N N I N G

Posted: October 20, 2009 10:33 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Darth
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 4601
Member No.: 838
Joined: June 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 558
wat
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: October 20, 2009 10:35 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Plano|Adam
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1449
Member No.: 228
Joined: February 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 107
s0z br0z i dont kn0wz
 
--------------------
user posted image
"If at first you don’t succeed, call it version 1.0"

Posted: October 20, 2009 10:39 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: dieyou2000
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 711
Member No.: 1300
Joined: August 28, 2008
Total Events Attended: 158
QUOTE   Samurai-JM @ October 20, 2009 05:33 pm)

physics is easy

Then tell me how to do it. Honestly not in the best mood right now as I probably just failed a physics test because my teacher is a prick.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

Posted: October 20, 2009 10:48 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: chappell44
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 500
Member No.: 148
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 132
confused =[
 
--------------------
msn id = [email protected]

Posted: October 20, 2009 11:17 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kurt Cobain
Group: Guest
Posts: 329
Member No.: 1619
Joined: January 7, 2009
Total Events Attended: 2
Okay, I was pretty bad with projectile motion, which is what this is, but I'll give it a shot...

You sound like you got A, B asks for time, so I think we would have to use a formula like t=(vf-vi)/a where...

vi = horizontal component, I believe
a = -9.81 m/s^2
t = ?
vf = 0 m/s

vf = 0 because you're looking for the time it takes for the thing to hit the ground (unless it bounces, which I doubt a cannonball would do) and then solve for time.

3) For this, you need the time in the last answer to find distance. It should be your horizontal component times Time. If it was from a top of a building, I might be able to help more, but then you'd see a wall of text and I'd probably scare my dogs with my cursing trying to do this problem with no scratch paper. neko2.gif

4) Maximum height is using the vertical component in the formula used to find the answer to 1. You then use that answer and plug time into (1/2)at^2. "a" should be 9.81m/s

I think thats how all of these are done... You can do the work for it and see if it all works out.

Don't worry about your physics stuff this early on in the year, I promise you it'll get better. Hopefully by the end of the year you'll be on electricity and that is SOOOOOO easy. I could do it in my sleep. Advice, get a graphing calculator if you don't have one, there are some very VERY useful functions on some of them (TI-83s/84s cost a lot, but still have some cool functions I could show you if you have one of them), and the next big thing you probably will have to worry about is Buoyancy or friction. Turning stuff is pretty annoying too, but you'll live, I hope.
 
--------------------
user posted image
Thanks Sam for an awesome job and an awesome wait!
user posted image
QUOTE   Back to Own)

I never send PMs over RSC
But you sir, are a legend

Posted: October 21, 2009 03:15 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: dieyou2000
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 711
Member No.: 1300
Joined: August 28, 2008
Total Events Attended: 158
Thanks FullMetal and Robbie I understand what I'm supposed to do now. Just need some practice and I'll be good.

Thanks a ton guys. happy.gif wub.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

Posted: October 21, 2009 03:23 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
QUOTE   Fullmetal792 @ October 20, 2009 11:17 pm)

Okay, I was pretty bad with projectile motion, which is what this is, but I'll give it a shot...

You sound like you got A, B asks for time, so I think we would have to use a formula like t=(vf-vi)/a where...

vi = horizontal component, I believe
a = -9.81 m/s^2
t = ?
vf = 0 m/s

vf = 0 because you're looking for the time it takes for the thing to hit the ground (unless it bounces, which I doubt a cannonball would do) and then solve for time.

3) For this, you need the time in the last answer to find distance. It should be your horizontal component times Time. If it was from a top of a building, I might be able to help more, but then you'd see a wall of text and I'd probably scare my dogs with my cursing trying to do this problem with no scratch paper. neko2.gif

4) Maximum height is using the vertical component in the formula used to find the answer to 1. You then use that answer and plug time into (1/2)at^2. "a" should be 9.81m/s

I think thats how all of these are done... You can do the work for it and see if it all works out.

Don't worry about your physics stuff this early on in the year, I promise you it'll get better. Hopefully by the end of the year you'll be on electricity and that is SOOOOOO easy. I could do it in my sleep. Advice, get a graphing calculator if you don't have one, there are some very VERY useful functions on some of them (TI-83s/84s cost a lot, but still have some cool functions I could show you if you have one of them), and the next big thing you probably will have to worry about is Buoyancy or friction. Turning stuff is pretty annoying too, but you'll live, I hope.

I see a major mistake: When velocity is 0 is not when it hits the ground, but at the peak height of the projectile's flight. From there, you simply need to know that the time to the peak is the same as the time from the peak to the ground.

Calculator wise, I suggest a TI81, 82 or 85. They look boxy and old, and should be between $10 and $20 on ebay. They aren't the fastest, but are great calculators for all sorts of things, and graph fast enough anyway.
They are also near-indestructable. I have a TI81 that I use in the machine shop at school, I have dropped it quite a few times, its always getting coolant, oil and water splattered on it.. it still works great. Also, once I found out how to adjust the screen contrast(second function + UP/DOWN key), I haven't had any trouble with batteries.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm helping Dieyou2000 in IRC right now, only posting this as a followup.

for A), we use trignometry:
sin(25)*50.0 = Y component = 21.130913087
cos(25)*50.0 = x component = 43.3153893518

For cool.gif, we take formula 1, and fill it in. we use Vf = 0 to get the point at the peak:
vf=vi+at
0 =21.130913087-9.8T
so
21.130913087 = 9.8T
T = 2.15621562112

Now, for the time to the ground, we double that:
TTG = 2.15621562112 * 2 = 4.31243124224

For C), we take formula 4 and simplify it
x=1/2(vi+vf)T
simplifies to
x=vT if velocity is constant, so
x = 4.31243124224 * 43.3153893518 = 186.79463831


For D), lets use:
x=vi(t)+1/2at^2
so
x = 21.130913087*2.15621562112+.5*(-9.8)2.15621562112^2
x = 45.5628048867 + .5*-9.8*4.64926580476
x = 45.5628048867 -22.7814024433
x = 22.7814024434

If we used:
x=1/2(vi+vf)t
x = .5*(21.130913087+0)*2.15621562112
22.7814024434
We get the same answer.




 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Posted: October 21, 2009 03:41 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kurt Cobain
Group: Guest
Posts: 329
Member No.: 1619
Joined: January 7, 2009
Total Events Attended: 2
Thanks for pointing that out Robbie, like I said, I was bad with projectile motion last year... I also got sick for the week we went over it, came back and had a test over it. I got a 40 from guess work. Then Ike hit and I just stopped caring about physics. Ended up dropping the hard class and getting the better teacher.

I didn't think I did 2 right originally since I went back and checked it in my calculator and saw my answer was off. I was better with sound levels, electricity and current, and waves anyway, lol.
 
--------------------
user posted image
Thanks Sam for an awesome job and an awesome wait!
user posted image
QUOTE   Back to Own)

I never send PMs over RSC
But you sir, are a legend

Posted: June 20, 2010 03:33 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: kajju
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 128
Member No.: 2293
Joined: June 11, 2010
Total Events Attended: 8
i done intermediates exams but never met a problem like this wtf are thesE???@!?$!@?
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: June 20, 2010 04:19 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: dieyou2000
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 711
Member No.: 1300
Joined: August 28, 2008
Total Events Attended: 158
Don't bump old, useless topics.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image