This. I couldn't care less about what's going on.
 
--------------------

[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

I know and I agree.. But don't think the press pushes it a bit too much when they start analyzing every other detail? "oh and the building they just drove past is made of limestone which is very unusual in this neighbourhood"

I mean.. Shut the fuck up and cut to the chase.

Like I said they take out 16 hours of a normal day to broadcast the wedding. I am very happy for them that they are getting married but if we left out all the irrelevant details the broadcast could easily be boiled down to 4-6 hours.

And all the repetations.. Instead of doing it over and over again the same day please do a documentary or something and show some other day. I don't see the idea. It costs alot of money.. Money that could have been spent on uniting people out in the big world.
 
--------------------


Click me if you need cheering up - I guarantee happiness will blossom

They got declined.
 
--------------------

#1 In Heaven's Slayer Challenge ##

Originally WG since 16/05/06



v -Click below for Goals & Achievement Thread- v

Its cause the thought it was another fast food chain.
 
--------------------

Maybe yours do but ours don't cash in + they are not that big a tourist attraction in Denmark.
 
--------------------


Click me if you need cheering up - I guarantee happiness will blossom

Yes I agree, but again, if they cut it down to 4-5 hours they make less money... there's nothing wrong with the BBC or Sky or CNN making money for broadcasting one of the most important days of the year for millions of people to the whole world
 
--------------------

King and Queen of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth Realms.

The Welsh, Scots and Northern Irish (and possibly some Commonwealth royalists) will rape you for that comment.

BTW I'm not a royalist, but as others have said, the royal family do far more good for the UK than bad. The money they bring in off the Crown Estates alone (which all goes to Parliament) outweighs the money given to them from taxes more than twice over. And that's not even including the money they bring in via tourism.
 
--------------------




~ Elite (Council) of The Sabre Clan :: RuneFest 2010 Attendee ~
~ Ex-Descendant Guardian :: Ex-Wilderness Guardian (2005-2006) ~

Two things from me.
Damn you antimonarchist. Im proud to be british. And the queen is part of our british culture always have been. In reference to the Danish royal family. No offence Dallar thats just because no one has heard of Denmark.. They did not have an empire that covered half the glove they had very little.
British Queens have always been great historic figures. From Bodiccea to Queen Victoria. I dont think there anti-monarchist i just think they dotn really understand what it is to be british.

As for your second point.. WoW.. George... Please learn your politics. We may think we're not a super power. We havnt been since the 1950s. Ye the world still knows were here hell we scared the shit out of russia in the 80s. BUt we not a super power. turn of the 20th century we were. At the end we are not. We are a major power yes. But superpower no. Theres only one super power atm. The US. China isnt quite their yet.

I do believe Australia is in the process of removing connections with the british monarchy. I do believe she was on your 5$ bills and then was removed?

But influential no. The British Monarchy has no powers. We are a Consitutional Monarchy. They havnt had any power since Charles I. It was shown all over the world because it is world news. The British Royal Family is the most famous in the world. THink about it when you think of britain you think of the queen. Its only Natural that a King of Englands marriage would be shown.

Now. I wait for the morning when you all reply.
 
--------------------