. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official
 Invisible tanks.
Posted: May 13, 2008 03:26 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: So
Group: Guest
Posts: 606
Member No.: 36
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 2
Wow , just found this.
QUOTE

New technology that can make tanks invisible has been unveiled by the Ministry of Defence.

In secret trials last week, the Army said it had made a vehicle completely disappear and predicted that an invisible tank would be ready for service by 2012.

The new technology uses cameras and projectors to beam images of the surrounding landscape onto a tank.

user posted image
Now you see it: How the tank might look with background images beamed onto the side

The result is that anyone looking in the direction of the vehicle only sees what is beyond it and not the tank itself.

A soldier, who was at the trials, said: "This technology is incredible. If I hadn't been present I wouldn't have believed it. I looked across the fields and just saw grass and trees - but in reality I was staring down the barrel of a tank gun."

Breakthrough: The MoD's 'Q', Professor Sir John Pendry

How the technology works in a combat situation is very sensitive, but the MoD is believed to be testing a military jacket that works on the same principles.

It is the type of innovation normally associated with James Bond, and the brains behind the latest technology is the MoD's very own "Q" - Professor Sir John Pendry, of Imperial College London.

He said the only drawback was the reliability of the cameras and projectors.

But he added: "The next stage is to make the tank invisible without them - which is intricate and complicated, but possible."

Posted: May 13, 2008 03:28 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls
Group: Banned
Posts: 2956
Member No.: 422
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 130
Holy crap - Wooooo! Go England biggrin.gif
 
--------------------
Mugger84
Member Of WG Since 4th April 2008.
WG Raid Leader Since 20th June 2008.
WG Council Since 20th November 2008.
Banned from WG Since 6th March 2009.
DF IG Since 6th March 2009.
DF FA Since 15th March 2009.
Ex-Member Of WG Since 26th March 2009.
Member of DF Since 6th April 2009.
Clan Friend of WG Since 4th June 2009.
---
||Ex-WG Warlord || Current Member of DF || Ex-Rampage Leader ||
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 04:59 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Tnuac
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1806
Member No.: 51
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 58
Yeah, when i saw it on james bond i had a feeling it would work.

But it would cost a heck of a lot, and when the tank's likely to be destroyed, that would waste a lot of money
 
--------------------
~Aetas: carpe diem quam minimum credula postero~

"Seize the day and place no trust in tomorrow"


user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 05:00 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
I dont trust Daily mail but it looks cool and would suck if it was put into motion. The enemy will just use radar to locate it.
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 05:38 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Bam
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2762
Member No.: 131
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 111
no fuckin way...
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 06:07 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: General199
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1073
Member No.: 318
Joined: March 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 0
This is good for England but bad once everyone else gets their hands on it.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 06:51 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
QUOTE (General199 @ May 13, 2008 01:07 pm)
This is good for England but bad once everyone else gets their hands on it.

yer imagine u walking on the street and all of a sudden u get runed over by an invisible tank..that would suck
 
--------------------

Posted: May 13, 2008 07:43 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Spicy63
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 785
Member No.: 50
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 0
Yeah, I believe it.

I tihnk it has much more to it then what the article sais though.
And would only be used under VERY special circumstances.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 07:44 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Angus0000
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 705
Member No.: 572
Joined: May 3, 2008
Total Events Attended: 128
Wouldn't the amount of noise those things make outweigh the whole invisibility aspect? I mean, I guess it masks the approach from afar, but when is the next time England is going to invade anyone?
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 08:31 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: So
Group: Guest
Posts: 606
Member No.: 36
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 2
Two good points made there Angus hash.png
I cant really think of any uses of this but its cool.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 13, 2008 08:42 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Parth23 Jani @ May 13, 2008 08:31 pm)
Two good points made there Angus hash.png
I cant really think of any uses of this but its cool.

Germans and the Americans <3
Wouldn't when the tank fires the cannon on its body, with the vibrations flowing through the tank disable the system anyway?
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 10:21 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
so how is it gonna hide muzzle flash?
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: May 13, 2008 10:40 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ May 13, 2008 10:21 pm)
so how is it gonna hide muzzle flash?

Invisible Shells?
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 14, 2008 12:16 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
QUOTE (Yingyang06 @ May 13, 2008 05:00 pm)
I dont trust Daily mail but it looks cool and would suck if it was put into motion. The enemy will just use radar to locate it.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

The thought of an invisible tank is nice and all, but what happens when you can 'sort-of' see an invisible tank but you can't tell wether its yours or not? plus realistically this only stops people from shooting them and not other tanks/vehicles/aircraft which almost all will be equipped with digital sights of some sort that will see stright through projections (Due to the fact that a tank has a massive heat signature from the large engines they have, as well as their rather large magnetic signature.).

I cant see them wasting time on a technology that I doubt would work.

 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: May 14, 2008 12:20 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ May 14, 2008 12:16 am)
QUOTE (Yingyang06 @ May 13, 2008 05:00 pm)
I dont trust Daily mail but it looks cool and would suck if it was put into motion. The enemy will just use radar to locate it.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

The thought of an invisible tank is nice and all, but what happens when you can 'sort-of' see an invisible tank but you can't tell wether its yours or not? plus realistically this only stops people from shooting them and not other tanks/vehicles/aircraft which almost all will be equipped with digital sights of some sort that will see stright through projections (Due to the fact that a tank has a massive heat signature from the large engines they have, as well as their rather large magnetic signature.).

I cant see them wasting time on a technology that I doubt would work.

I agree, but maybe this is one step towards a completely invisble and stealth tank.. You can do it with planes and boats, why not tanks or cars? hash.png

What i find funny is that its in the Daily mail but you cannot find it in the Sun, The EADT (East-Anglian Daily times), The Sunderland Metro, The Guardian or any other up to date news papers.
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 14, 2008 12:39 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
QUOTE (Alakadavi @ May 13, 2008 10:51 am)
QUOTE (General199 @ May 13, 2008 01:07 pm)
This is good for England but bad once everyone else gets their hands on it.

yer imagine u walking on the street and all of a sudden u get runed over by an invisible tank..that would suck

milklaugh.gif

Oh, and yeh, it's pretty impractical for a lot of reasons...
 
--------------------