Haha I'm only a raid leader, but I try my best




Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Haha I'm only a raid leader but oh well I'll try my best




Brandon

pssh same thing but still a winner
 
--------------------
Havochaha Perm Banned Oct 1st 2009
Havochaha Unbanned February 13th 2011

http://www.erepublik.com/en/referrer/Omar+Dandan
How to Make 10m an Hour

Can you please point out any skillers for me? The most important REQUIREMENT of joining WG is to be 100 F2P Combat. People who are of this combat level or higher should have no problem warring, sure they might get piled first every time but that is their decision to make.
 
--------------------

I think it's more of a reference than a sector. Just so he knows who's willing to drop what they're doing to go to the war and to monitor progress.

He's said that nobody who isn't on the list will be automatically turned away, but just won't be given priority. I assume in Full-Outs, any and all attendees will be allowed to war?

If you want to make it less formal, think of it like a gathering or group therapy or something like that. Support groups. Everyone who's participating has the same goal in mind, and just doesn't want to lose sight of it, so they bind together to help each other. Not prohibiting others from joining, but just giving those who have decided to commit the priority when they are called upon.

I agree that this is a good idea, but I still feel like it might create some segregation, despite the points I've made myself.

I just think it might resemble the sectors a little too much.

However, if you're able to make it different, like really different, then go for it.
 
--------------------

Whether or not there is a skillers list, that isn't the point. But lets say I have not attended wars in about a month. Then one day, I become really war hungry, and I really want to go to the next possible war. If I wasn't on the fighting list, I had a chance of getting cut. That would really piss me off, but I don't think anyone would understand my point of view unless they were on the side of skillers, no offense tbh.

I completely 100% understand the need for a fighting list. But I can almost guarantee that a large amount of the members not on the list will feel left out, and will want their own list.

There really is no simple solution for this. Those who commit on the warring list don't deserve to be cut. They made a commitment, and they should be able to attend as many wars as possible without being cut. On the other hand, sometimes the rest of us do like to war, just not every waking moment of our RS life (exaggeration). Getting cut every time because we aren't on the fighting list will aggravate some people, myself included.

If you decide to use these fighting lists, try to have a few more full outs to make the rest of us happy .
 
--------------------

Whether or not there is a skillers list, that isn't the point. But lets say I have not attended wars in about a month. Then one day, I become really war hungry, and I really want to go to the next possible war. If I wasn't on the fighting list, I had a chance of getting cut. That would really piss me off, but I don't think anyone would understand my point of view unless they were on the side of skillers, no offense tbh.

I completely 100% understand the need for a fighting list. But I can almost guarantee that a large amount of the members not on the list will feel left out, and will want their own list.

There really is no simple solution for this. Those who commit on the warring list don't deserve to be cut. They made a commitment, and they should be able to attend as many wars as possible without being cut. On the other hand, sometimes the rest of us do like to war, just not every waking moment of our RS life (exaggeration). Getting cut every time because we aren't on the fighting list will aggravate some people, myself included.

If you decide to use these fighting lists, try to have a few more full outs to make the rest of us happy .

Yeah, that would be a pretty big problem. I personally would be on the list, because that's what I do anyway. Go when I'm needed, but I can totally understand how aggravating it would be to get cut each time I really wanted to war, only because I wasn't on the list.

Maybe try something like each war you've got there are 5 or so spaces for walk-ons. In cases like this, 5 of the list members get put on the sideline. Who gets benched will just be a simple matter of order on the list. Alphabetical, who joined first, etc. Sure it's not the best solution, but it's a way of being unbiased.

This is also just a suggestion. You might only want 2-3 walk-ons to give the warrers more practice, and have the ones who want to war rewarded.

Also, have restrictions on walk-ons. Like:
- can't walk-on for two consecutive wars
- if you've attended a war in the past 2 weeks, give priority to someone who hasn't

What I mean by the second is this:

Person A is not on the list, but hears there is a war in 20 minutes and feels pumped so he decides to go. He gets there and is put in. Next week there is another war (assuming there have been several in between, thus following the no-consecutive war rule) so he decides to go again but Person B hasn't been put on yet because this is his first time. Person A should then give priority. This way those on the list get to quench their thirst, but not nearly as frequently as those on the list.

In any case, just make sure you tweak it so it's not as segregating as it sounds.
 
--------------------

You're idea wasn't shunned down. 1 person didn't like it cause they mis-understood it.
 
--------------------