Welcome Karl

Hop into IRC for an interview!

this is house of random stuff not Inactivity Notices and Resignations

Hey Justin, welcome to our forums

Ask in IRC for an interview!

Welcome back Anthony

frog

Nice to see PvP being looked at on both games

Hey welcome back, one more level to go

Welcome and good luck

Quote from: Bam on January 23, 2014, 10:11:52 pm

you dont need to make a new post for every single trip....just make a blog.

postcount.

you can get just as much post count from using a blog, just look at mine, 8 pages of me getting post count

Quote from: Mojohaza1 on January 23, 2014, 09:46:57 pm

Quote from: Sean on January 23, 2014, 09:43:40 pm

Quote from: Mojohaza1 on January 23, 2014, 09:39:13 pm

Quote from: Sean on January 23, 2014, 09:35:42 pm

Quote from: Randy on January 23, 2014, 08:32:45 pm

Quote from: Colinwarrior on January 23, 2014, 03:07:59 am

Quote from: Randy on January 22, 2014, 11:45:08 pm

Quote from: Colinwarrior on January 22, 2014, 11:33:45 pm

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP.

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

Wat, I got to level 15 in about 12 hours during one of the beta weekends... I guess it's just different play styles.

ye I haven't rly played anythin like gw2 before.
I was just following the storyline quest thing and completing all the area things.

Have never played GW2 before.
Just continuing the quote tower.

stfu albert

Quote from: Randy on January 23, 2014, 08:32:45 pm

Quote from: Colinwarrior on January 23, 2014, 03:07:59 am

Quote from: Randy on January 22, 2014, 11:45:08 pm

Quote from: Colinwarrior on January 22, 2014, 11:33:45 pm

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP.

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

I made a suggestions thread with like a half-dozen reasons to remove worlds and Jagex actually polled the question. I'm very pleased to see that the OSRS mods take the time to read the suggestions forum and the community gets to vote on what updates they would like. I believe it's time for another total level voting requirement increase to keep the EOCers from voting in OSRS.

are they really gonna bother getting 280 total lvl just to hijack a poll?

Old school players don't like RS3 because of a few major updates Joel (eoc, interface, summoning, ge etc.)

They don't mind if it evolves without these things and if you didn't know the players vote on every change and it needs 75% to pass. Also they make sure ppl below 280 total can't vote.