dung

Clunk
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clunk

lol irl @ plonk being a word.

blank

Ah ok! Gradually come back to the community den.

Good luck finding that teaching job. Owen also just got a teaching job too, once you get some grounding with the job I think it's doable. Looking forward to it m8, the SG memberlist is growing and can use dat +1.

duck was already used

going from dock: cock

r u dum mojo

sock > suck

Quote from: Al on November 13, 2013, 09:50:06 pm

I'm paying $9.99 for my current monthly subscription for Xbox. 120 dollars a year.

Fuck Xbox.

buy a year in one go then?

It's like that one time paying for 1 year of RS "Elite Platinum Gold" membership, I don't know if I'll still be playing. I'm not into Xbox that much atm to drop $60 np. All the games/franchises are just repeats and I lost interest lol.

I'm paying $9.99 for my current monthly subscription for Xbox. 120 dollars a year.

Fuck Xbox.

Jagex allowing people to buy xp

Nowadays you get a lot of xp from world events, squeal, quests, etc., but you can't exactly "buy" your way to 99s, unless you have an unlimited amount of money. I can't see anyone actually spending that much money to get ahead, it's unpredicatable and A LOT of money. I've heard of people that tried to do this and failed. ...

Jagex have stated on Q&A livestreams that people can't just buy their way into skills. They are aware players are concerned about this, which leads me to think there's some sort of code that doesn't allow you to mass purchase a lot of lamps and xp. Maybe, maybe not, but I don't believe you can; I haven't seen anyone do it. Anyone that dumps a ton of money to get xp...why would you even. Defeats the whole purpose.

Jagex allowing RWT

Technically, OK. You can now use your real-life money to buy a bond and convert it to gold. But this wasn't meant to be real-world trading, and that's still against the rules. Jagex can do it because it's their intellectual property. It becomes illegal when people trade (steal it off the game I guess?) and sell it for their own profit.

I think 5 dollars for 7.2m for bonds is too expensive for someone to be buying gold. Not to mention there's a 10% tax right? If they really wanted to they could get 1M for 0.31 cents from a gold selling site or from players (I've seen 8 dollars for 25m on http://www.sythe.org/).

Before the taxes, getting 125m from Bonds for Drygore Maces to boss hunt with for example, would take 18 bonds, 90 dollars. That's a lot more compared to 38.75 from a gold site or 40 dollars from a player. If anyone was okay with buying gp in the first place I don't think they would say, "Hmm, I think I'll pay 50 more dollars for the "legit" way."

ur so bad albert

Freck

is apparently a word: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freck

is it? this is what merriam-webster shows on mine: http://gyazo.com/49eecf3696484c9e1db543b1b1ff7c5d
if i type in any other word it comes up with the definition

vio i didn't find treck in merriam or cambridge either

typed in freck and treck in oxford and both entries came not "no exact entries were found" http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/

Imo not worth rushing to try. From my experience with when KK was released, I tried to join parties and attempted to kill it so many times. It was hours before I actually got a kill. I stayed there for about 11 hours and got nothing but deaths. To me it's more worth the time to sit back and learn from streams, videos, experimental/pro bossers until you at least know how to kill it somewhat.

edit: @JagexTimbo: @Lord_Zoinkwiz We've been posting on the forums, switch to OpenGL before you try to log in. There are issues with DirectX at the minute!

-Mod Timbo. Maybe this has something to do with the lag/crash?

Quote from: Al on November 12, 2013, 06:24:56 pm

Quote from: Kung_Man149 on November 12, 2013, 06:18:32 pm

Farmed

"Cases of words obviously playing off itself under the same genre of meaning: e.g. Muffled > Muffler > Muffle, Battled > Battles > Battler > Battle"

change?

Quote

You cannot play a word directly off its previous**.....

The previous word was not Farmed, it was Former, case invalid.

Farmer

(Page 4)

Uhh...

Farmed

(Page 3)

So a word or derivative of the word was previously used in the same round it cannot be used again. That means Mojo did break a rule so from that point the game shouldn't have continued.  The winner should be revoked and the game reversed back to the end of page 3, on the word former.

dormer.

dormer (window)
noun [C]       /ˌdɔː.məˈwɪn.dəʊ/  US  /ˌdɔːr.mɚˈwɪn.doʊ/
› a window sticking out from a sloping roof

duck