Archives > RuneScape Discussion

Y U No Do Citadel? :(

Pages: << < (2/5) > >>

George:

If you all think citadels are purely cosmetic and the features are crap, then I suggest you look at the rs wikia page on clan citadels.
There's a lot of stuff that is not useless.

Vephy:

The argument that citadels are a waste of time and that we should be doing raids/wars is pretty ridiculous to me.  The citadel takes 1-2 hours a week which is 1-2 events.  If you can't do that and a war and a raid during the week you just aren't active to me and you are making excuses.  Sorry, but it basically is a fact.  Not to mention those 1-2 hours are at your own leisurely pace in a week.  Its just laziness and inconsideration toward others that try.

This isn't an issue about priorities, its an issue with everyone's activity.  Get it right.  Thanks again.

BeeBee:

edit: nvm

Vephy:


--- Quote from: Panda|Vulcan on September 30, 2011, 08:31:55 pm ---edit: nvm

--- End quote ---

Dying to know what you had to say lol.

BeeBee:

I guess i was talking about its a difficult discussion as everyone has different views on things, i for one didn't like playing RS, especially for skilling. But maybe i posted it a bit more brutally :P

So i guess me and Ramm have similar views. But then again you say people are not doing there skilling for this, but then people dont sign up for warring too so. If people arent doing this for the clan, some arent signing up and attending wars for the clan.

If we had a clan that was large or if we had sectors, this discussion would be different, as not everyone would need to go out of their way to do something they didnt want but.

It's not always activity or laziness or unwillingness that stops us from doing it, it's the fact we dislike doing the citadel or dislike runescape skilling or similar. I tried my best to help WG, but this just wasn't my thing, and i don't think my activity was something to question

Edit: just realised i may have gone off topic and said something pointless, im not awake, sorry :p

Pages: << < (2/5) > >>

Go to full version