Archives > RuneScape Discussion

RWT Legalised?

Pages: << < (2/3) > >>

Anat:


--- Quote from: Mark on April 03, 2012, 05:06:46 am ---
--- Quote from: Anat on April 03, 2012, 05:01:29 am ---
--- Quote from: Mark on April 03, 2012, 04:42:05 am ---I'd want to profit too.

--- End quote ---
Short-term or long-term?

--- End quote ---
Short term if theyve already fucked the game over and lost 3/4 of their paid subscriptions

--- End quote ---
But that hasn't happened.

Mark:


--- Quote from: Anat on April 03, 2012, 05:10:16 am ---
--- Quote from: Mark on April 03, 2012, 05:06:46 am ---
--- Quote from: Anat on April 03, 2012, 05:01:29 am ---
--- Quote from: Mark on April 03, 2012, 04:42:05 am ---I'd want to profit too.

--- End quote ---
Short-term or long-term?

--- End quote ---
Short term if theyve already fucked the game over and lost 3/4 of their paid subscriptions

--- End quote ---
But that hasn't happened.

--- End quote ---
Yeah it has o.O.

Anat:

Not that I care to see any kind of proof to the claim that they lost 3/4 of their subscribers, beside it being beyond the point, it's just not true (yet). Would you care to elaborate on the point you're actually trying to get across here Mark because I don't understand what you're trying to say with your topic-straying one-liners?

PineappleTom:


--- Quote from: Anat on April 03, 2012, 07:27:05 am ---Not that I care to see any kind of proof to the claim that they lost 3/4 of their subscribers, beside it being beyond the point, it's just not true (yet). Would you care to elaborate on the point you're actually trying to get across here Mark because I don't understand what you're trying to say with your topic-straying one-liners?

--- End quote ---

I think he is trying to say: 'Post count'.

Mark:


--- Quote from: Anat on April 03, 2012, 07:27:05 am ---Not that I care to see any kind of proof to the claim that they lost 3/4 of their subscribers, beside it being beyond the point, it's just not true (yet). Would you care to elaborate on the point you're actually trying to get across here Mark because I don't understand what you're trying to say with your topic-straying one-liners?

--- End quote ---
Lol i went way over with 3/4 of course, was just trying to display a point, stats were during before the bot nuke:

1/4 of players are bots.
1/5 players use a bot or have used a bot.

Removing of BH worlds due to majority vote by single pkers killed clan pking for the most.
-Overall declined in the numbers of players in clans + the amount of clans themselves leads to a lower amount of subscriptions.

Removal of bots stopped a significant of clanners from playing as they were just buying GP from mass producing gold farmers - also for some other regular players buying gp.

If I'm too vague I apologise, or if you have some crazy mofoing mod secrets that you feel like enlightening everyone with ill read ##

Pages: << < (2/3) > >>

Go to full version