Archives > Clan World Discussion

Clan Rating System

Pages: << < (3/7) > >>

Al:


--- Quote from: Panda|Vulcan on October 13, 2012, 12:54:58 pm ---1. you can't rank up anymore - ranking means nothing anyway when there is barely a top 3
2. the "RAW rankings" is now an opinion-based sticky topic and not organized anymore - That's because RAW was a failure.
3. top clans like VR and EoS (sadly, I'm probably missing some) DDoS attacks to win wars, but still get ranked high - We know we killed the clan world. Most clans DDoS now.

--- End quote ---

Got something to say?

Mojo:


--- Quote from: Al on October 13, 2012, 08:44:56 pm ---
--- Quote from: Panda|Vulcan on October 13, 2012, 12:54:58 pm ---1. you can't rank up anymore - ranking means nothing anyway when there is barely a top 3
2. the "RAW rankings" is now an opinion-based sticky topic and not organized anymore - That's because RAW was a failure.
3. top clans like VR and EoS (sadly, I'm probably missing some) DDoS attacks to win wars, but still get ranked high - We know we killed the clan world. Most clans DDoS now.

--- End quote ---

Got something to say?

--- End quote ---

I think he just said it.

Pacman Syu:


--- Quote from: Kez on October 12, 2012, 11:20:52 pm ---
--- Quote from: Owen on October 12, 2012, 08:36:45 pm ---
--- Quote from: Kez on October 12, 2012, 07:50:03 pm ---http://wildernessguardians.com/table.htm

--- End quote ---


So out of date.

--- End quote ---


Compare it to us today:

#1: YES, we're actually in the top 10 oldest clans
#2: NO, we haven't had a proper P2P PK in ages
#3: NO, even though I prove how fun it is countless times, but no-one listens
#4: YES we have official wars once a month
#5: NO we don't have PKRIs weekly because we'd get trashed by every clan out there
#6: YES because Nightshade is awesome
#7: YES because we're at GWD more often than the actual NPCs
#8: SORT-OF, for example we do host the Aussie raid but no one shows up
#9: YES all our non-PvP is optional
#10: NO we don't have over 150 members, we have about 15
#11: NO we don't focus on rank-climbing, we focus on mountain-climbing instead
#12: YES we have a website even if it hasn't been updated in over a year

--- End quote ---


Actually, we (WG+DG) seem to have 30 members (2 Advisers, 2 Elite Guardians, 2 Event Masters, 10 Guardians, 3 High Guardians, 2 High Soldiers, 2 Leaders, 1 Raidmaster, 6 Soldiers), not to mention 16 initiates. Not horrible!

Al:


--- Quote from: Mojohaza1 on October 13, 2012, 08:51:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: Al on October 13, 2012, 08:44:56 pm ---
--- Quote from: Panda|Vulcan on October 13, 2012, 12:54:58 pm ---1. you can't rank up anymore - ranking means nothing anyway when there is barely a top 3
2. the "RAW rankings" is now an opinion-based sticky topic and not organized anymore - That's because RAW was a failure.
3. top clans like VR and EoS (sadly, I'm probably missing some) DDoS attacks to win wars, but still get ranked high - We know we killed the clan world. Most clans DDoS now.

--- End quote ---

Got something to say?

--- End quote ---

I think he just said it.

--- End quote ---

Misread, ##

Moving on, what do you guys think appropriate and measureable variables for the equation?

Owen:

playing style = what does the clan focus on?
coach stability = is the leader stable and there to stay?
championship contender = Jagex Cup contender
television exposure = public relations, what reputation they have in the clan world
coach prestige = what can the leader(s) bring or benefit/teach you?

These are unquantifiable categories, so you can't exactly use them in an equation...

Pages: << < (3/7) > >>

Go to full version