Kingdom Come. If RS dies we're moving to this game.

[Randy]

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1294225970/kingdom-come-deliverance

Just watch the video. Just watch it.

[Mister Kyle]

"Achieved with CryEngine.."

Okay I'm sold

[Randy]

This game could possibly encompass everything WG strived for in RS.

[Mister Kyle]

Dibs on Historian rank

wait there's no multiplayer

[Randy]

Dibs on Historian rank

wait there's no multiplayer

The game is faaaaaaaaaaaar from release. I heard 2016. Too early to say.

[Sean]

Impressive. Doubt it'd run on my shitty laptop though, GW2 barely runs on it at medium settings. :(

[Tayzon_Day]

"Realistic single-player RPG"

nty

[Colinwarrior]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

[Randy]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

[Colinwarrior]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

[Mister Kyle]

I'd say personnel and funding. However it seems like it's getting a strong backing, and I'm sure after a year or so they'll actually consider it.

[Sean]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

If you want large castle sieges with hundreds of players, you can get that now to an extent in Guild Wars 2. Even more so in Elder Scrolls Online, when it's released in April.

[Mojo]

Interesting o.O

[Randy]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

[Sean]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

[Mojo]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

[Sean]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

Wat, I got to level 15 in about 12 hours during one of the beta weekends... I guess it's just different play styles. :P

[Mojo]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

Wat, I got to level 15 in about 12 hours during one of the beta weekends... I guess it's just different play styles. :P

ye I haven't rly played anythin like gw2 before.
I was just following the storyline quest thing and completing all the area things.

[Al]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

Wat, I got to level 15 in about 12 hours during one of the beta weekends... I guess it's just different play styles. :P

ye I haven't rly played anythin like gw2 before.
I was just following the storyline quest thing and completing all the area things.

Have never played GW2 before.
Just continuing the quote tower.

:stoke:

[Mojo]

Looks pretty neat. Kind of irrelevant if it's single-player. But as you said, it's still in early stages of development.

It seems like a complete wasted opportunity to a potentially perfect multiplayer game.
30v30 castle sieges? Horseback combat?
If this game doesn't have multi maybe it will be successful enough to spark other developers' interest in this sort of thing.

PLZ WARHORSE PLS

Yeah we can only hope. Although I don't know why this developer wouldn't implement MP technology to this game. It's like...the perfect game for it.
Maybe they lack the personnel to develop and maintain it? Lack the funding? Don't have the servers to run it on?

I played GW2 for a month. Was boring. They hyped it up as no grind but the game was 100% grind. Story was super uninteresting as well.

There's very little grind if you play dungeons at the appropriate levels (i.e. Ascalonian Catacombs the second you hit 30/35), although admittedly that's hard with elitist speed runners everywhere demanding gear checks. It is indeed very grindy if you do the hearts, but if you explore and just do random events, it's actually pretty decent. Takes 3-4 days of moderate play to max out at level 80. The big issue imo with GW2 is a complete lack of PvE endgame - unless you just want to run Fractals over and over. And the guild support is pretty shocking, still no guild halls, still no way for guild vs guild PvP. :/

I agree though, the personal story was quite lacklustre.

(I've not played GW2 in months btw, due to the aforementioned lack of endgame)

I played GW2 for a week or two and only got to lvl 15, went on it yesterday and they gave me lvl 20 for free because I'd been registered for one year lol.
So IDK how ppl level to 80 in 4 days lol!

Wat, I got to level 15 in about 12 hours during one of the beta weekends... I guess it's just different play styles. :P

ye I haven't rly played anythin like gw2 before.
I was just following the storyline quest thing and completing all the area things.

Have never played GW2 before.
Just continuing the quote tower.

:stoke:

stfu albert

[Taibz]

£299,074
pledged of £300,000 goal

[Mojo]

that was fast it I swear it was £50k away or something a few hours ago

[Colinwarrior]

The saving grace of GW2 is WvW or World vs. World. Massive server against server pvp. It's awesome and you get some pretty epic fights. Probably the best pvp I've played in any game. But yeah, most of the game is just grind and not that interesting.

[Elyxiatic]

"Achieved with CryEngine.."

Okay I'm sold

This.

[Keith]

related: what about this game http://www.archeagegame.com/en/